Local career woman wildly enjoys Family Day…alone?

20 Feb

I’ll confess.  I often peruse the Huffington Post in the mornings while I’m still in my jammies and having my first cup of coffee.  It’s just silly and sensational enough to hold my attention during these first groggy moments of the day (case in point).

This morning, a piece by Melanie Notkin caught my eye.  In it, Notkin verbalizes something I’ve been vaguely conscious of for some time: the pejorative status of the label “career woman”.  It’s a phrase that often rears its head during discussions with or regarding childless, single women in their thirties.  I know this because I am one.

While I’m rarely bothered by people’s inquiries regarding my own marital and parental status, it interests me that they’re so curious about it.  And, the most common question I get is loosely framed as a compliment: “How are you not married?”  The individuals asking this typically cite my looks, my intelligence, and my sense of humour as reasons that I should have been claimed by now.

I can categorize people’s reactions to my situation and responses as follow:

  • Surprise – This is the most common one.  Ladies my age have typically had a hubbie (or two) as well as some offspring.  Most common follow-up question: “What are you doing tonight?”
  • Concern – This one always comes from people from whom I don’t care to receive concern.  Most common follow-up question: “Do you realize that your fertility sharply decreases in your thirties?”
  • Envy – Here’s the one I get most often from fellow ladies whose lives have traversed the more well-worn path.  Most common follow-up question: “Can we trade lives for a while?”

Regardless of people’s responses and follow-ups, the conversation usually comes around to my education and career.  As it happens, I really loved school (so much that I spent nine years there pursuing two discrete degrees).  After that, I really loved my work (so much that, to this day, I regularly put in overtime that is not required of me).  These two facts in no way indicate that my education or career have anything to do with my choices regarding marriage and children, but people invariably draw their own conclusions, and these conclusions often include the label “career woman”.

Image

Figure 1: My worst nightmare.

With so-called “career women” being depicted as untrustworthy and unmarriageable by the likes of Michael Noer, as cavalier baby-jugglers by an unknown artist (see Figure 1), and as people deserving of concern and unsolicited advice by everyday folks, it’s understandable that the label is becoming less and less of a welcome categorization.  And, as Notkin points out, it might be entirely unrelated to one’s decision to remain single and childless.

Regardless of its potential irrelevance and pejorative nature, call me a “career woman” all you like; I get to enjoy (and get paid for) the following this year on Family Day:

  • Sleeping in because I stayed up late with great friends.
  • Chatting on the phone with my Dad and perusing the internet until early afternoon.
  • Eating peanut butter toast for lunch.
  • Reading books and watching ‘My Strange Addiction’ while continuing to wear my jammies on the couch until late afternoon.
  • Spending money buying wildly impractical undergarments online.
  • Shopping online for clothes that render previously impractical undergarments practical.
  • Casually cooking whatever I feel like eating for dinner.
  • Enjoying an evening doing whatever I want with whomever I choose.
  • Crawling into bed early with a good book.
  • Getting an amazing, uninterrupted sleep.

Figure 2: Me.

Who needs volume modulation? We’ve got temporary lip tattoos.

18 Feb

 

Isabella is 14 years old. She is the co-creator of these:

I can’t find the corresponding ‘No’, ‘I don’t like you that way’, or ‘I think someone put something in my drink’ tattoos.

Web design the Sarah Burge way

7 Jan
Human Barbie, Sarah Burge

Figure 1. Aspect ratio unchanged.

Sarah Burge has been making the news lately, and unfortunately it has nothing to do with her stunning personal website. Burge, the ‘Human Barbie’, recently presented her 7-year-old daughter with the Christmas gift every pre-teen dreams of: a £7000 voucher for liposuction. Said Sarah, “She asks for surgery all the time. She wants to look good and lipo is one of those procedures that will always come in handy.”

A past gift from mum came in the form of a £6000 voucher for breast implants.

“I see these vouchers as investing in her future – like saving money for her education.”

The media is naturally having a great time with this. Unfortunately, this means they’re missing a much bigger story: Sarah Burge’s home page, THESARAHBURGE.COM is a shining example for modern web design.

I think there are three key lessons to be learned.

  1. Web 1.0 is making a comeback. This site has a 1990′s-retro vibe. Static, colourful information is plentiful on this site, and it’s presented in a linear and perfectly-centred fashion. Text, graphics, links – all are presented in a crisp vertical layout that makes navigation simple. As well, the presence of a non-interactive guestbook makes one feel nostalgic – even youthful.
  2. Maintaining an image’s aspect ratio is a thing of the past. This rule may not be universally applicable; we’ll have to wait and see what direction designers take it in. I suppose when you’ve had upwards of £528,000 of plastic surgery, you look great regardless of the scaling of an image. I’m not sure those of us who are ‘pre-plastic’ can get away with this type of modern editing (see Figure 2).

    Figure 2. Aspect ratio changed.

  3. HTML5 allows font, font-size, italics, underscore, caps-lock, and other text formatting to vary spontaneously with the introduction of the new ‘random’ attribute. This tastefully artistic, yet readable site is a perfect example of its use. Note the delicate balance that’s been struck here. While modern design encourages this type of textual variance, it’s still not considered acceptable to use blink or marquee.

I’ve really only touched on a few points here, but do have a look for yourself. You’re sure to find your own inspiration for forward-thinking web design.

And speaking of inspiration, I’d like to leave you with a quote from Sarah, herself:

I’m a woman who has always lived life to the full – My police officer father arrested John Lennon on drugs charges, I became a teenage prostitute, I worked as a Bunny Girl, I made love to Hollywood legend Telly Savalas and to footballer George Best, I mingled with the stars, and was beaten to within an inch of my life by the person who claimed to love me most. I have made more comebacks than Frank Sinatra…

A frustrated ‘pink aisle’ shopper

27 Dec

If I didn’t know better, I’d think this was an old video of a young Ruby Slater longing for fewer Barbies and more Transformers, thank you very much!

Tags:

IAmA Female Computer Scientist; AMA

17 Dec
Computer Engineer Barbie

An actual female computer scientist

Misconceptions about computer scientists are rampant.  Here is a mere sampling:

  • Computer scientists are all dudes.
  • Computer scientists are all nerds.
  • Computer scientists are all socially inept.
  • Computer scientists are all great at math.
  • Computer scientists only drink energy drinks.
  • Computer scientists do nothing but write code.

Granted, stereotypes have to start somewhere, but computer scientists are a diverse bunch. So, while you will meet those who live up to the stereotype, there will always be others who do not. Unfortunately, it’s been shown that one of the reasons ladies may not be entering the field is that they cannot relate to the associated cultural stereotypes.  Consequently, they perceive themselves to be outsiders, and are dissuaded from joining the club.

However, some of us have never felt this way, and are happily engaged in work at the nerdery. Some of us, in this case, amounts to slightly less than 25% of the compsci grads. So, I have to wonder, in a field with such strong overall stereotypes and misconceptions, what kind of incorrect information is floating around about that rare breed that is the female computer scientist?

To find out, I considered giving a talk at a recent BarCamp – a Reddit-IAmA-style talk letting the audience ask me questions they might have given I was a lady-nerd (one of only a small handful present that day). But, I had a suspicion that there might actually be no questions – surely the dude-nerds present already understand what’s up with their lady-counterparts and grok that misconceptions are just that.

I also considered posting an IAmA post on Reddit to see what kind of questions would spew forth from the masses, but I was concerned that this wouldn’t weed out interesting nuggets and might actually encourage a lot of unwanted attention. A quick review of past posts by ladies in my situation proved me right. Here’s a sampling:

what’s the quickest way to turn you on?

I just want a face-pic to see if you’re pretty

Is your goal to sleep with everyone of the boys in your major?

Are you fat?

pics ?

wow, marry me

Are you a virgin?

Ok so forgive me if I imply this, but the girls in CS at my engineering school in NC are more accurately described as ‘creatures.’ So I ask what would you/your friends rate you in attractiveness on a scale from 1-10?

Admittedly, there were some good questions interspersed with the anonymous junk. But, I realized the questions in this forum weren’t what I was most interested in.  Instead, this exercise brought me to a realization about what I was actually looking to understand. Specifically, what are the misconceptions about computer scientists held by young ladies who have an interest in entering the field?

With that in mind, let me say that if you or someone you know fit into this category of interest, send me some questions! You can enter them in the comments section, or email me at ruby@thepinkaisle.com  But please, check first that they don’t already appear in the list above.  Those important questions have already been answered by others elsewhere.

Tags:

Female-centric requirements gathering not just woman’s work

10 Dec

I almost always listen to CBC Radio One when I’m in the car. So it’s no surprise that I was doing so this Wednesday on my way to a doctor’s appointment. It was rather a long drive, which gave me a fair bit of time to listen in on an episode of Spark featuring an interview with UCLA’s Jane Margolis, author of Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Ms. Margolis studies gender and race inequality in computer science, a background-interest of my own.

Nora Young’s lead-in to this interview of course mentioned the dramatic imbalance of males to females who participate in computer science, but what really caught my ear was that her interest in talking to Ms. Margolis was to find out whether or not this imbalance matters, and why. This is a question that’s always seemed really relevant to me: the imbalance is striking, but should we care? I hoped it would take me long enough to drive to the doctor’s office to find out.

Typically, I hear only a few justifications for concern over the dearth of women in computer science, the most convincing and concerning (to me) being that there may be plenty of young ladies who’d love to become involved, but feel as though the field is a boys’ club, that it is too intimidating, or that it is prohibitive in some other way. If it’s the case that there are budding young nerds out there who feel as though their dreams are being denied, clearly this needs to change (whether said nerds are male or female). More often, though, the reason I hear is that diversity in the field is important – that women bring different perspectives and skill sets to the table than men. While this may be true, it hardly seems so earth-shatteringly important that we rouse women from their preferred paths to draw them into a field in which they may have little or no interest.

Margolis, however, takes this latter justification a step further. She contends that a lack of gender diversity in the field may actually be detrimental to women. The analogy drawn is to an all-male design team who created early models of air bags that were life-saving for males, but fatal for females. To bear out the analogy, technologies created with men in mind may not be the right fit for women. This is a fair concern, but I’m still not convinced it’s the golden goose.

Consider this, would the involvement of women in the above scenario necessarily have solved the air bag problem? The only conclusion I can reasonably reach is ‘maybe’. The reason for my lack of conviction is that female involvement would only have prevented these problems if the women involved performed better requirements gathering than the males. In other words, the mere presence of a woman may not have cued the team to the fact that something modelled only with the average man in mind might actually be harmful to a woman. Only if the women (and men) considered the specific needs of the end user would the outcome have been changed.

Customer requirements gathering is a critical part of computer science. Programmers like to create. And we like to write code. Sometimes, we really like what we’ve made. This doesn’t necessarily translate to customer satisfaction (in fact, the gap here is present so often that many methodologies call for nearly constant customer involvement to avoid repeatedly producing the ‘wrong’ product). As such, it’s really important for designers and developers to consult with end users about what software must do for them. A general comparison can be drawn between customer requirements gathering and considering someone for whom you are purchasing a gift: you should always buy the gift the recipient wants, not the one you want (there is a tendency to get this backwards despite the painful simplicity of this rule).

The analogous activity in the case of the air bags would have been gathering requirements for all possible end users of said air bags. Is it true that women are the only ones who can effectively perform customer requirements gathering with respect to female end users? Certainly not. Requirements gathering is about considering all potential end users, and if possible, interacting with them to discover their expectations and needs. To be quite blunt, any dummy could have realized that men wouldn’t be the only ones getting into car accidents that might deploy an airbag. Similarly, there’s no inherent reason that a group of male software developers can’t understand that women are amongst the end users of their products.

Admittedly, customer requirements gathering is tricky business – there are times when customers are too busy, don’t know or can’t communicate specifically what they want, or are unavailable to the software team altogether. Granted, in situations where communication with these end users is impossible, it might be helpful to employ a diverse group of software developers who can substitute their own needs for those of the absent end user. But, when the breadth of software products is considered, it seems unlikely that any given software-development team is ever going to be diverse enough to cover all possible cases. For example, while a team might have a perfect balance of men and women on the team, their software might be intended to help farmers sell grain at the best possible price in the area where they reside. Are any of the developers farmers? Nope, but dammit, some of them are ladies!

To sum up, ladies are not the only people who can buy gifts for ladies. No, that’s not it. Ladies are not the only software developers who can develop software for lady software users. Right! So, although I enjoyed the interview with Jane Margolis (she had plenty of excellent observations on how male and female computer scientists tend to differ, as well as great arguments for multi-disciplinary teams), and although I’m stoked to read her book, I’m still not convinced that the perceived underrepresentation of females in computer science necessarily matters.

If you’d like to listen to Nora’s interview with Jane, here’s the podcast. 33:27 marks the spot.

Tags:

Happy American Appareloween!

31 Oct

DIY Halloween: Beach bum

Tags:

There are no words

12 Oct



And, while we’re on the topic, remember this?

Tags:

Having your period can be a relative bummer

26 Sep

We ladies all remember what it was like to be in high school and to be dealing with the reality of our first periods. How were we to wear our tiny gym shorts without advertising the fact that we were wearing huge maxi pads? What were we to do if our pads leaked in the middle of class? What if our stash of tampons ran out at the same time as our supply of pocket change? The list went on and on. It all seemed pretty serious.

Now, imagine that you’re in high school and your family can’t afford to buy your monthly supplies. Instead of worrying about how others might perceive you, your biggest worry is that you have to miss school for approximately three or four days of school every month to deal with your period, and this dent in your attendance is putting you at a major disadvantage relative to your male classmates.

Talk about perspective.

Enter Huru, a nonprofit organization that provides sanitary napkins and other helpful items to girls who would otherwise go without.

To see how Huru is affecting young girls, check out this clip and pay special attention around the 1:16 mark.

Tags:

Not strong enough for a man, but…

10 Sep

Ladyfish Ugly StikI’ve never discussed it here, but I’m pretty into fishing. Let me qualify. I do not get up at 5am to partake in this activity, but will often spend an entire day on a boat in the middle of nowhere. I catch. I kill. I clean. I eat. And I’m pretty sad that the season is ostensibly over.

To add to this disappointment, on my last fishing trip, I managed to destroy my fishing rod: a cheap Shimano I picked up at a Co-op gas station many years ago. Not only was it my only rod, it was my first (feel free to quote this out of context).

For a while, I left all my fishing gear in the dining room to remind me to fix things up so that next season it’d all be ready to go. This strategy proved unsuccessful. I’ve since put my gear away in the shed and started searching for a new rod and reel combo.

Enter Shakespeare Fishing Tackle, makers of Ugly Stik. Several of my friends use and like these rods, so I thought I might look into getting one.

Perusing the Shakespeare site, I was surprised to find that there is a ladies’ version of the Ugly Stik. Whaaaa? Besides (predictably) being adorned with pink, the Ladyfish Ugly Stik boasts:

  • Comfortable, ergonomic EVA grips designed specifically for women
  • One available configuration: 6′ 0″ two-piece medium action rod. Reel filled with 6 LB. line. (By comparison, the regular Ugly Stik is available in three configurations including medium-heavy- and heavy-action options as well as line rated for at least 12 LB.)
  • An unspecified portion of the proceeds from the sale of this rod go to benefit the American Breast Cancer Association.

This Stik hardly inspires my dreams of being a badass fish killer, but I thought I’d check out some reviews. So, I headed over to the Bass Pro Shops site. Here are some excerpts of what I found.

  • I bought this for my wife. She has been using cheap combo’s for the past two years. This is her first reel set up (<- Get it?) and she loves it!
  • …for Mother’s Day i got [my mom] this light action combo and she loves it.
  • my son and i bought this rod and reel combo for my wife for mothersday and its a great setup we had to restring it but thats normal for combos it seems . im going to buy 1 for my mom now .
  • Bought this set-up for my wife and she loves it. The rod is very light and lets you feel the nibbles from the fish. Reel kind of winds up a lil messy but its a good rod for woman.
  • my husband bought this product for me and it worked just fine for the first few months.
  • I bought this for my gf, and she absolutely loves it.

One review is allegedly written by an actual woman but, in all seven cases, reviews are regarding purchases made by men for women.

I was hopeful that Amazon might feature some more informative reviews by women, and although I did find one (albeit not a great one), I found several that are well summed-up by the title of this one from a man: Perfect for my wife.

Maybe it’s just a great, lighter-weight rod? Says ‘Jerkbaitdude’, Ok I don’t care if it’s got PINK on it…it gives me the perfect length and action needed to able to throw light baits and then work quality Bass to the boat. So much fun! I had originally bought it for my wife but now it’s my rod….PINK or NO its a great rod.

Marketing gimmick? Great rod? Both? I’m more tempted to head out to the shed and fix my Shimano than I am to find out.

Tags:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 199 other followers